New Moon

November 20th, 2009








Advertisments








New Moon

Still of Kristen Stewart, Taylor Lautner and Robert Pattinson in New MoonStill of Taylor Lautner in New MoonAnna Kendrick at event of New MoonStill of Cameron Bright in New MoonStill of Taylor Lautner in New MoonStill of Taylor Lautner in New Moon

Plot
Edward leaves Bella after an attack that nearly claimed her life, and in her depression she falls into yet another paranormal relationship- this time with werewolf Jacob Black.

Release Year: 2009

Rating: 4.5/10 (113,124 voted)

Critic's Score: 44/100

Director: Chris Weitz

Stars: Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Taylor Lautner

Storyline
After Bella recovers from the vampire attack that almost claimed her life, she looks to celebrate her birthday with Edward and his family. However, a minor accident during the festivities results in Bella's blood being shed, a sight that proves too intense for the Cullens, who decide to leave the town of Forks, Washington for Bella and Edward's sake. Initially heartbroken, Bella finds a form of comfort in reckless living, as well as an even-closer friendship with Jacob Black. Danger in different forms awaits.

Writers: Melissa Rosenberg, Stephenie Meyer

Cast:
Kristen Stewart - Bella Swan
Christina Jastrzembska - Gran
Robert Pattinson - Edward Cullen
Billy Burke - Charlie Swan
Anna Kendrick - Jessica
Michael Welch - Mike
Justin Chon - Eric
Christian Serratos - Angela
Taylor Lautner - Jacob Black
Ashley Greene - Alice Cullen
Jackson Rathbone - Jasper Hale
Russell Roberts - Mr. Berty
Cam Gigandet - James (archive footage)
Michael Sheen - Aro
Jamie Campbell Bower - Caius

Taglines: The Next Chapter Begins



Details

Official Website: Official site [France] | Official site [United States] |

Release Date: 20 November 2009

Filming Locations: Columbia Street, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

Box Office Details

Budget: $50,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend: $142,839,137 (USA) (22 November 2009) (4 Screens)

Gross: $709,827,462 (Worldwide) (31 October 2011)



Technical Specs

Runtime:



Did You Know?

Trivia:
Dakota Fanning took the small role of Jane in order to prepare for her role as Cherie Currie in The Runaways biopic, with her co-star Kristen Stewart. She later said that the role helped her to establish the relationship between the two in real-life and characters Cherrie and Joan Jett, which Fanning and Stewart play respectively.

Goofs:
Incorrectly regarded as goofs: Since Carlisle has been a doctor for over 100 years, he could still have plastic syringes with metal cap needles for personal use at home.

Quotes:
Bella Swan: It's one year older than you.
Edward Cullen: No it isn't. I'm 109.



User Review

So BAD I find it funny

Rating: 3/10

I've read all the books. I know what happens. This never ruins a film for me.

I didn't want to see this film because the previous one was lacking in... well... everything. But girlfriend wanted to see it. I went in and was instantly surprised to see the demographic had widened past 12-16 year old girls who instantly swoon at any even remotely hot guy so that was interesting. It's not relevant to how good the film was- it just reaffirmed to me (and should to all of you) that hating a series on principle or having preconceived notions of how bad something will be is unfair on it.

Not in this case. It was still bad. BUT worth the money I payed to see it because though it most definitely not intended to be entertaining in the way I found it. It was full of melodramatic dialogue and bad acting which, if you take ANY Drama classes at school- Which Robert DIDN'T- you'll notice certain things about how people deliver lines. You notice how they're SAYING lines they have memorised with unnatural and stylised emphasis on the key words in the sentences without giving the (cheesy) dialogue depth or realism. Quite simply, it was so terrible I found myself resisting the urge to burst out laughing in a room full of fans who were probably misinterpreting the melodrama as "Good, emotional drama." No. This film is ridiculous.

As it goes further on it gets less tightly stitched together and I had to become reliant on my knowledge of the books to fill in and pick up the slight gaps in dialogue and plot. They would say things that are based on something that didn't happen on screen (probably deleted scene for time) or their dialogue would just be terrible unrealistic lines that are work as standalone ones for a trailer but in conversation it seems like they're jumping slightly just to get to say something that is dramatic without it actually making too much sense.

BUT! It does have SOME redeeming qualities! The melodrama wasn't nonstop hilarity so thankfully something else held my attention. There was actual effort put into this film. The fight scenes actually used REAL special effects (something the first film was a bit cheap on) which actually looked kinda impressive. Any action was short lived unfortunately but what little there was, they did a reasonable job with.

I was impressed at the presence of transition. The previous film jumped and skipped and the next plot point just WAS without having been caused. This film (until near the end, of course) actually had a pace and a coherency to it that allows you to understand it without reading the books. This is a bonus. Certain things you'd think would drag on as the director tries to give you time to let the "emotion" "sink in" thankfully didn't take forever and the entire movie fit almost snuggly into its 2 hour length. Too bad it fell apart more and more it went along.

The film also shares the semi-awkward character interactions that create the same humour as the first one. Not as deliberately funny as the first one (though, as I said, it was pretty hilarious when it wasn't meant to be) though.

Though it was many failings with only a few things to back it up as being a reasonable film it will definitely make all you little teenage girls out there desperate to see Jacob's hell tanked up body very happy. You can HEAR the audience's reaction the first time Jacob takes his shirt off. He's got all you need: Pecs, biceps, ABS OF STEEL and minimal clothing. Too bad he lacks depth and real character. (Girls love obsessively devoted Zombies, they don't think enough to complain) It is NO WAY even NEAR one of the best films of 2009. NO ONE should say this ridiculous claim.

Really tossing up between 3 and 4 stars. Mmm. I guess a movie's highlight shouldn't be how low it sinks. 3.




Comments:

Comment on “New Moon”


Name :

E-mail:

Website:





Advertisments